The transitive core: inference of welfare from nontransitive preference relations
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper studies welfare criteria under an environment in which a decision maker is endowed with a nontransitive preference relation. In such an environment, the classical utilitarian welfare criterion may not identify the welfare order, and the problem of maximizing the decision maker’s welfare becomes ambiguous. In order to find a criterion that applies to nontransitive preference relations, I propose a set of desirable properties of welfare criteria and uniquely identify a consistent rule that infers welfare orders from nontransitive preference relations. This rule, called the transitive core, is applied to a variety of nontransitive preference models, such as semiorders on a commodity space, relative discounting time preferences, regret preferences on risky prospects, and collective preference relations induced by the majority criterion. These examinations show that the proposed method provides successful inference of welfare in respective contexts. JEL Classification: D11, D60.
منابع مشابه
The transitive core of preference relations
Much evidence suggests that a preference relation of a decision maker is often not transitive in reality. Armstrong [1, 2, 3] and Luce [11] argued that, in contrast to the standard utility theory, a preference relation of a decision maker is suffered from nontransitive indifferences due to the imperfect powers of discrimination. Kahneman and Tversky [8] presented the extensive experimental resu...
متن کاملUtility representation of an incomplete and nontransitive preference relation
The objective of this paper is to provide continuous utility representation theorems analogous to Debreu’s classic utility representation theorem, albeit for preference relations that may fail to be complete and/or transitive. Specifically, we show that every (continuous and) reflexive binary relation on a (compact) metric space can be represented by means of the maxmin, or dually, minmax, of a...
متن کاملCan Adaptive Conjoint Analysis perform in a Preference Logic Framework?
Research on conjoint analysis/preference aggregation/social choice aggregation is performed by more than forty years by various communities. However, many proposed mathematical models understand preferences as irreflexive, transitive and statical relations while there is human psychology research work questioning these properties as being not enough motivated. This works propose to position the...
متن کاملQuasi-transitive and Suzumura consistent relations
We examine properties of binary relations that complement quasi-transitivity and Suzumura consistency in the sense that they, together with the original axiom(s), are equivalent to transitivity. In general, the conjunction of quasi-transitivity and Suzumura consistency is strictly weaker than transitivity but in the case of collective choice rules that satisfy further properties, the conjunctio...
متن کاملPrefrontal cortex: role in acquisition of overlapping associations and transitive inference.
"Transitive inference" refers to the ability to judge from memory the relationships between indirectly related items that compose a hierarchically organized series, and this capacity is considered a fundamental feature of relational memory. Here we explored the role of the prefrontal cortex in transitive inference by examining the performance of mice with selective damage to the medial prefront...
متن کامل